Cardarine (GW-501516)
Also known as: Cardarine, GW-501516, GW501516, GW 501516, Endurobol, Cardarin
Not a SARM despite being sold as one — and the substance on this site whose development was stopped because it caused cancer in multiple organs across multiple species.
Substance family
They increase metabolic rate or mobilise fat through adrenergic and thermogenic mechanisms. Cardiac load is the shared limiting factor, and it adds up when they are combined.
Effects on
Which outcomes this substance acts on — descriptive, not a recommendation.
Strain profile
Where this substance is most likely to hit — a rough orientation, individually dependent on dose, duration and predisposition.
This substance causes
Dosing & protocols by goal
Rough orientation ranges as reported in harm-reduction literature — not an individual treatment plan. Doses are individual and open-ended; frequency depends on the ester or half-life.
Approved medical use
MedicalDose
—
Frequency
—
Cycle length
—
None. GSK discontinued development in 2007 after long-term animal studies found tumours.
Endurance and fat loss (grey market practice)
ExperimentalDose
10–20 mg / day
Frequency
1× daily
Cycle length
8 weeks
The commonly reported range. No human dose was ever established, because the trials that would have established one were stopped.
Higher doses
ExperimentalDose
> 20 mg / day
Frequency
Varies
Cycle length
—
The animal carcinogenicity findings were dose- and duration-dependent. There is no basis for assuming a safe threshold in humans.
Side effect & countermeasure
Typical problems and what you can do to reduce harm — at a glance. Does not replace medical monitoring.
Problem
Carcinogenicity in animal studies — the reason development stopped
Countermeasure
This is not a footnote and cannot be dosed around. In two-year rodent studies, cardarine produced tumours in multiple organs — liver, bladder, stomach, skin, thyroid, and others — across both rats and mice. GSK ended the programme in 2007. Whether this translates to humans is unknown, because the studies that would answer it were never done. Anyone using it is accepting a risk that has no upper bound in the available data.
Problem
Marketed and discussed as a SARM
Countermeasure
Cardarine does not touch the androgen receptorandrogen receptorThe docking site in the cell that androgens bind to in order to have any effect.. It is a PPARδ agonist and causes no hormonal suppressionsuppressionThe body shutting down its own testosterone production because an external source is present. — which is true, and is often presented as though it made the substance safe. The risk here is not hormonal.
Problem
Elevated liver values
Countermeasure
Reported in users. Check ALT, AST and GGT before and during; do not combine with other hepatotoxic substances.
Problem
Unverified grey-market quality
Countermeasure
Sold only as a research chemical. Content and purity are unverified. Only sources with an independent HPLC/MS analysis — though that does nothing about the underlying concern.
Problem
Long detection window in doping tests
Countermeasure
Detectable for an extended period and specifically screened for. WADA published a rare direct health warning about it, separate from the prohibition itself.
Overview
Cardarine is sold and discussed as a SARM, and it is not one. It does not bind the androgen receptor, causes no suppression and has no hormonal effects at all. That part of the marketing is accurate.
The reason it belongs on this site with a clear warning is different, and it is the most serious safety finding attached to any substance in this database apart from DNP.
Mechanism of Action
PPARδ is a receptor in the cell nucleus that regulates how tissue uses energy. Activating it shifts muscle metabolism towards fat oxidation and increases the expression of genes associated with endurance — in mice, the effect on running capacity was pronounced enough that the compound was nicknamed "exercise in a pill".
The effect is real, non-hormonal, and there is no suppression to recover from. On mechanism alone, cardarine looks like an unusually clean substance.
Then GlaxoSmithKline ran the standard two-year carcinogenicity studies required before human trials can proceed.
Tumours appeared across multiple organ systems — liver, bladder, stomach, skin, thyroid, and others — in both rats and mice, at a range of doses. The development programme was terminated in 2007 and never resumed by anyone.
That is the entire basis on which this substance should be judged. Whether the finding transfers to humans is genuinely unknown, because the trials that would answer it were stopped before they began. What can be said is that the mechanism PPARδ activation involves — cell proliferation and gene expression — is one where an animal carcinogenicity signal is not easy to dismiss.
Typical Context
Ten to twenty milligrams daily over eight weeks, used for endurance and fat loss, frequently stacked with SARMs on the reasoning that it adds no hormonal burden.
That reasoning is correct as far as it goes and misses the point entirely. The absence of suppression is often presented as evidence that cardarine is the safe part of a stack. It is the part with an unresolved cancer signal.
WADA's handling is telling. Prohibited substances are simply listed; cardarine received a separate, explicit public health warning — an unusual step that reflects how the anti-doping community read the toxicology.
Side Effects & Risks
- Carcinogenicity in long-term animal studies across multiple organs and species
- Elevated liver values
- No hormonal suppression — which does not make it low-risk
- Unverified grey-market quality
- Long detection window in doping tests
- No human safety data of any kind
Blood Work & Monitoring
There is no marker that detects the risk this substance carries. Liver values are worth tracking for a separate reason:
- Liver values (ALT, AST, GGT) — before and during
- Complete blood count — as a baseline
Harm-Reduction Notes
- The carcinogenicity finding is the decisive fact — it stopped a pharmaceutical development programme
- The absence of hormonal suppression is real and irrelevant to the actual risk
- No dose has been established as safe, and none can be from the available data
- Not a SARM; the comparison misleads about where the risk sits
- Only sources with an independent analysis, though that addresses purity and not the substance itself
- Unsuitable for anyone subject to doping controls
Legal status by region
Regulation differs considerably between jurisdictions and changes over time. This is a rough orientation, not legal advice — check the rules that apply where you are.
| Region | Regulatory status |
|---|---|
| United States | Not approved for human useSold as a research chemical; the FDA has warned about SARM-marketed products generally. |
| EU / UK | No marketing authorisation |
| Most other jurisdictions | Unregulated grey area |
| Competitive sport | Prohibited at all timesWADA issued an unusual explicit health warning about this substance alongside the ban. |